<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CFQUERYPARAM and IN/NOT IN clauses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codewords.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/cfqueryparam-and-innot-in-clauses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codewords.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/cfqueryparam-and-innot-in-clauses/</link>
	<description>Code, in words.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:58:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://codewords.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/cfqueryparam-and-innot-in-clauses/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codewords.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/cfqueryparam-and-innot-in-clauses/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>This is a fundamental limit for databases.
SQL is not designed for large in-line datasets.
You are abusing IN. When you run into this problem it is a &#039;bad smell&#039; coming from your DB schema, time for a refactor.
If you really need more items than that then you can use a temporary table, insert all the values into it, and then use a select inside of the IN. Selects are not constrained by the in-line data limit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fundamental limit for databases.<br />
SQL is not designed for large in-line datasets.<br />
You are abusing IN. When you run into this problem it is a &#8216;bad smell&#8217; coming from your DB schema, time for a refactor.<br />
If you really need more items than that then you can use a temporary table, insert all the values into it, and then use a select inside of the IN. Selects are not constrained by the in-line data limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
